December 21, 2020 | Reading Time: 3 minutes

Why deny Russian sabotage now?

Trump's interest isn't clear, but the GOP's is.

Share this article

Why is the president downplaying the significance of a security breach said to be “on a scale Washington has never experienced,” according to the Times. As a result of a Russian hacking operation dating back to October 2019, Joe Biden will now “inherit a government so laced with electronic tunnels bored by Russian intelligence that it may be months, years even, before he can trust the systems that run much of Washington.”

The Russians not only got into government networks, but also its supply chain, which is vast. That’s why the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said it “poses a grave risk to the federal government and state, local, tribal, and territorial governments as well as critical infrastructure entities and other private sector organizations.” That’s why one expert called it “the most consequential cyberespionage campaign in history and the fact that the government is absent is a huge problem.”

The Republican Party’s interest seems rooted in its capacity to look the other way during times of national emergency.

And yet Donald Trump said nothing for days until he said something, which was more of what you’ve come to expect from a man who conspired with the Russians to win the presidency in the first place. “I have been fully briefed and everything is well under control,” Trump tweeted. “The Cyber Hack is far greater in the Fake News Media than in actuality.” He said the press corps “exaggerated the damage” and “the real issue was whether the election results had been compromised,” per the Times. “There could also have been a hit on our ridiculous voting machines during the election,” Trump wrote.

In fact, the breach was like an act of war. US Senator Chris Coons told MSNBC: “It’s pretty hard to distinguish this from an act of aggression that rises to the level of an attack that qualifies as war. … [T]his is as destructive and broad scale an engagement with our military systems, our intelligence systems as has happened in my lifetime.” Biden appears to be preparing some kind of response: “A good defense isn’t enough,” he said, vowing “substantial costs on those responsible for such malicious attacks.”

Here’s the tip jar!

While reporters look into what that response might be given the damage done to the nation’s security, we should ask why Trump continues to deny Russian sabotage? Denial used to make sense. He feared widespread understanding of his conspiracy with the Russians to win the 2016 election might endanger his chances of being reelected. Denial was in his interest. What’s his interest now in the wake of defeat?

Trump’s might not be clear but the Republican Party’s interest is crystal. With the exception of US Senator Mitt Romney, who has always been a keen Russia critic, no one in the GOP has stepped forward to condemn Russia’s cyber-attack. No one has done what Coons and other Senate Democrats have done, likening the assault to an act of war, promising to support the next commander-in-chief in defending the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They haven’t because saying nothing is in their interest. Saying nothing improves their chances of winning Georgia runoffs needed to keep control of the US Senate. Saying nothing tells Vladimir Putin he can do whatever he wants. Saying nothing puts party over country, power over patriotism.

Indeed, the Republican Party’s interest seems rooted in its capacity to look the other way during times of national emergency. They looked away during the financial panic of 2007-2008, leaving the Democrats to pick up after a Republican administration that wrecked the economy while blaming them for ballooning deficits. They looked away after the Sandy Hook massacre, allowing mass shootings to proliferate while blaming Democrats for trying to take guns away (a lie). They looked away during the 2016 election, allowing the Russians to sabotage Hillary Clinton while blaming the Democrats for “spying” on Trump’s campaign. They looked away as a once-a-century plague killed more Americans than all those who died fighting the Second World War. And they looked away while a defeated president talked about declaring martial law.

What’s Trump’s interest? I don’t have an answer. All I can do is suggest that this latest attack on our sovereignty is a fitting end to a presidency that emerged in the shadow of the Kremlin. All I can do is suggest that small and hard-to-see but nonetheless appreciable acts of war were a feature of Trump’s presidency, not a bug. All I can do is suggest that malicious forces outside our borders have been working in concert and/or in tandem with seditious forces inside our borders to wound our country or worse. All I can do is suggest that the people calling themselves patriots are anything but patriotic.

John Stoehr

John Stoehr is the editor of the Editorial Board. He writes the daily edition. Find him @johnastoehr.


  1. Burgs on July 30, 2021 at 11:27 pm

    Someday, I really hope that we can find out exactly what’s been motivating Trump’s actions for the past 4+ years, especially with Russia and foreign policy in general. Without exception, his foreign policy actions have been as shady as hell.

    Trump is certainly not a very complex person or personality, so I’m pretty sure that whatever it is that Putin has been dangling over his head would immediately explain his behavior in a simplistic but consistent manner. Trump is as transactional of a person as anyone who’s ever walked the Earth, so he protecting Putin to protect himself, it’s just the “what” that’s the question, we pretty much know the “who, where, why and when…”

  2. Jim Prevatt on July 30, 2021 at 11:27 pm

    “the people calling themselves patriots are anything but patriotic.” Well said, young man. And thanks for saying it.

  3. John Smart on July 30, 2021 at 11:27 pm

    I relaize I’m the darker than most around here but I believe this is quite simple: Yes, Trump looked the other way to pay off a debt. and yes Also leaving Biden on the hook is part of the plan but chaos in the next few weeks is THE PLAN.

    Also if a party that represents 40% of the country’s population no longer protects the country shouldn’t we be logically asking if we actually have a country anymore? I am one who thinks we do not. It is reasonable to at least THINK about how a peaceful break up would work…and how many actual countries there are in this “country” .

  4. Thornton Prayer on July 30, 2021 at 11:27 pm

    I think people sometimes overthink what motivates Trump and the GOP overall. I believe their objectives are very clear and explicit.

    For example, I think Trump’s denial is very simple – he wants to build his mega hotel in Moscow and needs to curry favor with Putin to make this happen. Remember that during the 2016 campaign, he had Michael Cohen and Felix Sater quietly trying to negotiate a deal by gifting the top floors to Putin. Trump is fixated on this project and is happy to jeopardize our national security so long as he can see his name on the tallest building in Moscow. Add in his long-term connection with Russian mob money and money laundering through his properties, then this is even more straightforward. If he needs to publicly deny any Russian threats to America to get his ultimate deal, he’s fine with that.

    As far as the rest of the GOP, it’s the same three-part reactionary goal of Plutocracy, Theocracy, and White Supremacy. Like Trump, they don’t care about the people or America’s principles so long as they can entrench their authoritarian utopia. Like Nixon sabotaging the Vietnam peace talks in the 1968 campaign, and Reagan (allegedly) undermining the attempts to bring home the hostages from Iran during the 1980 campaign, it shouldn’t be any surprise that the GOPers would ignore even the most aggressive cyber attack ever on our government.

Leave a Comment

Want to comment on this post?
Click here to upgrade to a premium membership.